Sentence examples for substantial errors that from inspiring English sources

Such measurements are subject to substantial errors that can be difficult to overcome, but corrected data are readily available and can be of sufficiently high resolution to be integrated into traditional field-based studies.

First, the original bill was drafted so haphazardly with so little review that there almost certainly are substantial errors that need to be corrected.

We expect that the diagnoses of interest here also have substantial errors that reduce both sensitivity and specificity.

And if you identify a paper that you think has a substantial error that is not easily fixed, then the authors of this paper will find it hard to not hold a grudge.

Thus, assuming that PFP is constant over time may not be safe, and reported estimates of incidence should properly reflect the uncertainty and potential for substantial error that would arise if PFP increases with time since infection.

I was initially not told about a substantial error that had occurred during surgery.

One patient reported the following: I was initially not told about a substantial error that had occurred during surgery.

Contamination of tumour VOIs by normal proliferating bone marrow signal may cause substantial errors such that in tumours adjacent to the skeleton particular care was taken to ensure a margin between the delineated VOI and bone.

To address this issue, we demonstrated the systematic identification of molecular species using transposable error-correcting barcodes that are exponentially expanded to tens of billions of unique labels.We experimentally showed random-mer molecular barcodes suffer from substantial and persistent errors that are difficult to resolve.

Motivation: Assemblies of next-generation sequencing (NGS) data, although accurate, still contain a substantial number of errors that need to be corrected after the assembly process.

2482, 2492-2493, 1992L.Ed.2d 225 (1992) (opinion of THOMAS, J). The Kotteakos requirement of de novo review of errors that prejudice substantial rights—as all constitutional errors surely do—is thus entirely consistent with the Court's longstanding commitment to the de novo standard of review of mixed questions of law and fact in habeas corpus proceedings.