Sentence examples for substantial difference is that from inspiring English sources

One substantial difference is that humans brains are three times larger overall, notes Todd Preuss, a cognitive neuroscientist at the University of Louisiana, Lafayette.

LinkedIn spent more than a year tinkering with their public API, but the only substantial difference is that it now encrypts every member id with the identity of the developer and application to trace the source of a breach.

However, the substantial difference is that these aforementioned methods predict neither the strand nor the coding frame.

Related to the reason of our high detection ratio, the substantial difference is that we use all genes transcribed by RNA pol II including widely expressed (housekeeping) genes, while they only use tissue specific genes.

One substantial difference is that there is no substantial funding for cancer care, and that a large part of costs has to be covered out of pocket if the patient does not have private insurance coverage.

The substantial difference was that where on the Highland tour the orchestra's principal flautist, Alison Mitchell, played Poulenc's Flute Sonata as orchestrated by Lennox Berkeley, the soloist in Edinburgh was Karen Cargill.

One of the most substantial differences was that males had a higher number of nonresponses when examining student determined knowledge (16.41%) on the posttest compared with females (2.73%).

That's a substantial difference — is there any doubt Rodgers or Brees is the reason his team wins so much?

One important difference is that a substantial share of costs of dental services especially costs beyond routine dental treatment is paid directly by the patient out-of-pocket.

No substantial differences were found, suggesting that the overt phenotypes that were observed in Rab18 −/− mice were not caused by gross disruption of normal development that resulted from global loss of Rab18 expression but, rather, represented specific pathological responses in a restricted range of cells and tissues.

No substantial differences were found except that there was a higher percentage of urban residents among non-participants than among participants (34% versus 24%, p < 0.05).