substantial arguments

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "substantial arguments" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing points or reasons that are significant or important in a debate or discussion. Example: "The lawyer presented substantial arguments that convinced the jury of her client's innocence."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

18 human-written examples

The contest is more alive and substantial arguments have a better chance of winning the day.

The Guardian - Opinion

Democrats need to gather their strength, and Mr. Spitzer needs to help them marshal the substantial arguments for this cause.

The New York Times

There are substantial arguments to be heard about such targeting, and about the risk of further entangling politics and economics.

The New York Times

Ms. Seitz acknowledged that the question was "novel" and that there were "substantial arguments" in support of the opposing view.

The New York Times

Beneath such extravagant rage and rhetoric lie substantial arguments about a society's most profound issues: rule of law, national service, the very nature of citizenship.

The New York Times - Books

Moreover, it appeared especially unfair to require exhaustion of military remedies when the complainants raised substantial arguments denying the right of the military to try them at all.

Cornell University

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

42 human-written examples

A more substantial argument has to be had at the level of principle.

The Guardian - Opinion

That point of view is backed up by sound and substantial argument.

The Guardian - Sport

"That's a substantial argument, but not necessarily a winner," Little said.

The New York Times - Sports

The more substantial argument against quantitative easing is that purchases of securities would be ineffectual, given Europe's bank-based financial system.

The Guardian - Business

The continuing level of significant subsidy weakens the substantial argument that the industry is otherwise able to make that is it one of Australia's great success stories.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "substantial arguments", ensure the context clearly indicates what makes the arguments significant, whether it's the amount of evidence, the depth of reasoning, or the potential impact of the conclusions.

Common error

Avoid using "substantial arguments" when the reasoning is merely adequate or commonplace. Reserve this phrase for situations where the arguments genuinely stand out due to their strength, depth, or impact.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "substantial arguments" functions as a noun phrase where the adjective "substantial" modifies the noun "arguments". According to Ludwig AI, it’s grammatically correct and indicates that the arguments are significant or weighty.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

45%

Academia

30%

Science

25%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "substantial arguments" is a grammatically sound and frequently used phrase that signifies arguments of considerable importance and weight. According to Ludwig AI, it’s deemed correct and shows common usage across different contexts. The analysis reveals that it's predominantly used in News & Media, Academia, and Science, leaning towards a neutral-to-formal register. For enhanced clarity and impact, it is advisable to ensure that context clearly indicates what makes those arguments significant. Alternative phrases, such as "strong arguments" or "significant arguments", can be used based on the intended emphasis.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

strong arguments

Replaces 'substantial' with 'strong', emphasizing the forcefulness or persuasiveness of the arguments.

significant arguments

Substitutes 'substantial' with 'significant', highlighting the importance or consequence of the arguments.

considerable arguments

Replaces 'substantial' with 'considerable', suggesting the arguments are noteworthy in size or amount.

well-founded arguments

Indicates that the arguments are based on solid evidence or reasoning.

compelling arguments

Emphasizes the convincing or irresistible nature of the arguments.

cogent arguments

Highlights the clarity and persuasiveness of the arguments.

convincing arguments

Focuses on the arguments' ability to persuade or convince.

valid arguments

Stresses the logical soundness or correctness of the arguments.

sound reasoning

Shifts the focus from 'arguments' to the 'reasoning' itself, emphasizing its validity and reliability.

weighty reasons

Emphasizes the importance and impact of the reasons presented.

FAQs

How can I use "substantial arguments" in a sentence?

You can use "substantial arguments" to describe points or reasons that are significant or important in a debate or discussion. For instance, "The lawyer presented "substantial arguments" that swayed the jury."

What are some alternatives to "substantial arguments"?

Alternatives include "strong arguments", "significant arguments", or "compelling arguments", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to say "substantial arguments" or "substantive arguments"?

Both "substantial arguments" and "substantive arguments" are valid, but "substantial" emphasizes the quantity or weight of the arguments, while "substantive" suggests that the arguments are meaningful and have real content.

When should I use "substantial arguments" instead of "considerable arguments"?

"Substantial arguments" should be used when the focus is on the solidity and importance of the arguments, whereas "considerable arguments" emphasizes the magnitude or extent of the arguments.