Sentence examples for substance of something from inspiring English sources

For if there is to be any such thing as 'being essentially a man' this will not be 'being a not-man' or 'not being a man' (yet these are negations of it); for there was one thing which it meant, and this was the substance of something.

Z.3 begins with a list of four possible candidates for being the substance of something: essence, universal, genus, and subject.

It is the form of a substance that makes it the kind of thing that it is, and hence it is form that satisfies the condition initially required for being the substance of something.

First, whereas the subject criterion of the Categories told us that substances were the ultimate subjects of predication, the subject criterion envisaged here is supposed to tell us what the substance of something is.

The first three candidates are taken up in later chapters, and Ζ.3 is devoted to an examination of the fourth candidate: the idea that the substance of something is a subject of which it is predicated.

However, if the universal constitutes the substance of a particular, then it has to have the same act of being as the particular, because constituting the substance of something means precisely this, namely, sharing the act of being of the thing in question, as the thing's substantial part.

The reason for distinguishing two modes of natural signifying, as they appear in (1) and (2.1), is, on the one hand, an equivocation of the concept of nature, meaning "substance or essence of something" (substantia sive essentia cuiuslibet), as well as "force acting without deliberation" (virtus agens sine deliberatione) (De signis, 1978, 85f).

Preservation, he said, "is not about only the substance of the something, it's the way in which it is made".

Is it worth abandoning something of substance for something that is a frivolous, transient massaging of ego? Hearing that he had been unfaithful once infected all our preceding years together and left me sore, raw and smarting until a long time later.

Is it worth abandoning something of substance for something that may mean nothing, that is a frivolous, transient massaging of ego?

Given the undisputed fact that law claims authority, the only way to avoid an infinite regress is to assume that the authority of the foundational document or constitution derives from a "basic norm" (Grundnorm in German), the substance of which is something like "the constitution is to be obeyed".