Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(4)
Marked substance effects were observed since all three substances significantly increased average reflection time per game compared to placebo resulting in a significantly increased number of games lost on time with all three treatments.
This unphysiologically long stimulation causes an endocrine counteraction: GnRH analogues in this regard are a homogenous class of medicines exerting their effects by de-sensitization of receptors in the anterior pituitary gland rather than by single substance effects.
In addition, the portal survey technique performs a temporal evaluation of substance use and provides pre- and post-assessment of consumption, assuring the most reliable measure of substance effects.
As consequence, an explicit mathematical form describing the total mixture effect as a function of the single substance effects cannot exist, at least for the concentration response functions from Eq. (2)–(4), and CA mixture effects within each group can only be estimated at a given mixture concentration by numerical methods.
Similar(56)
Typically, a substance effect in the range of 1 to 10 % is set as tolerable level.
In this case, distinguishing a substance effect from the background mortality is more crucial, (KNK, SS, Wosniok W, submitted), [43].
However, from an environmental perspective, it is most important to safely identify the concentration of the substance effect which lies above the effect under control condition (spontaneous effect).
On the one hand, ecotoxicological data exist only for carbamazepine and phenytoin; on the other hand, according to [34], substances with similar targets can add their effects to each other and cause effects below the single substance effect concentrations.
As an example, if the substance effect increases and consequently the effect rate rises by 0.000001 (= 0.0001 %), the experimental group must contain at least 1/0.000001 = 1,000,000 objects to make the expected increase in response (by only one object) visible.
The two-way ANOVA reveals a Substance effect (F = 13.56, p<0.001) and a Group x Substance interaction (F = 13.09, p<0.001).
The two-way ANOVA indicates a Group effect (F = 7.81, p<0.01), but no Substance effect (F = 2.22, ns) and no Group x Substance interaction (F = 1.94, ns).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com