We limited our analysis to this subset of trials and the corresponding drugs.
With respect to duration of treatment, there was a significant increase in the subset of trials lasting ≥12 weeks (WMD: 0.88 μg/mL, 95% CI: 0.19, 1.57, p = 0.012) but not in the subset of <12 weeks of duration (WMD: 0.18 μg/mL, 95% CI: -0.23, 0.58, p = 0.390).
There was no difference between conditions during training, whether we considered the full set of trials, F 1,51) = 1.91; p > .17, or only the subset of trials for which the faster object was small and light, t 51) = 1.19, p > .24.24
We therefore analysed the subset of trials requiring the response 'same' in each condition.
Here we used all data trials rather than a subset of trials.
The subset of trials included for analysis were randomly selected from all trials within a condition.
In the Money condition, the incentive was an opportunity to win monetary bonuses on a subset of trials.
In the Liquid condition, the incentive was the opportunity to receive (again on a subset of trials) a squirt of apple Juice delivered directly into the mouth.
As we showed that there was not any significant effect of relevancy load in the subset of trials with completely independent number of relevant and irrelevant objects.
First, we confined our analysis to a subset of trials in which all combinations of relevant and irrelevant objects number existed (i.e. trials in which relevant and irrelevant objects number was less than 4).
That is, the pattern that a unit (or real cortical cell) is classified as exhibiting, as determined from the average PSTH pattern, might not be exhibited on some subset of trials.
