subsequently with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "subsequently with" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It is typically used when indicating a sequence of events, but the word "with" is not appropriate in this context. Example: "The team completed the project, subsequently presenting their findings to the board."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

But he's tight enough subsequently with two dots preceding a two, turned behind square.

The Guardian - Sport

Subsequently, with vividness and wit, the film presents the pair's own experience of being indigent and marginal.

The Guardian

The idea would be to ruff a spade subsequently with the club queen and finesse the club 10.

The New York Times - Arts

Subsequently, with the actor James Tomlinson, he set up Theatre North to tour provincial theatres in the north of England.

The Guardian

But this strange extra acceleration was seen subsequently with two other craft.

The Economist

In the aftermath of the affair, Levy and his wife did get to have dinner, first with Dayan, and subsequently with the Israeli prime minister, Golda Meir.

The Guardian

I don't think anybody can deny that that was a monumental achievement and he has been doing fantastically interesting things subsequently with marine life.

The Guardian

In World War II, he served with the Free French Forces in Africa and, subsequently, with the French Forces in Germany.

The New York Times

Taken by surprise by the guerrilla victory of 1959, he worked subsequently with Raúl Corrales, Castro's official photographer, to capture the excitement of the revolution.

The Guardian - Arts

Steamships were initially fuelled with wood, subsequently with coal or fuel oil.

Journal of Shipping and Trade

These oxidized copper species diffuse towards the surface and react subsequently with the environment.

Heritage Science

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using the phrase "subsequently with". It is grammatically awkward. Instead, use "subsequently, followed by" or rephrase the sentence for clarity and correctness.

Common error

Don't string together actions with "subsequently with" when a clearer, more concise connective like "and then" or "followed by" would improve readability and grammatical accuracy.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "subsequently with" functions as an adverbial modifier attempting to indicate a sequence of events, but it does so incorrectly. As Ludwig AI indicates, the phrase is not considered grammatically correct. Its usage aims to show that one action follows another, yet the inclusion of "with" creates an awkward construction.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

52%

News & Media

39%

Wiki

4%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "subsequently with" appears frequently across various sources, as noted by Ludwig AI, it's generally considered grammatically incorrect. It attempts to convey a temporal sequence but does so awkwardly. Predominantly found in science and news media, its usage aims to link events chronologically. For clearer and grammatically sound alternatives, consider using "subsequently, followed by" or rephrasing the sentence. Remember, clarity and correctness in writing are always paramount.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

subsequently followed by

This alternative more clearly expresses the sequential nature of actions or events, replacing "with" to avoid grammatical issues.

later with

This alternative replaces "subsequently" with the more common "later", creating a phrase that's less formal but maintains the meaning of following in time.

thereafter with

Uses a slightly more formal term than "later", but still suffers from the same grammatical issues as the original phrase.

afterward with

Similar to "later with", but with a slightly different connotation of time sequence.

followed by

Removes "subsequently" entirely to focus on the direct sequence, and also removes "with".

next with

A simpler and more direct way to indicate what comes after something else, but still has grammatical issues when used with "with".

consequently with

Suggests that the following event is a result of the first, not just that it happened after, also has grammatical issues when used with "with".

then with

Very simple replacement, lacks the formal tone of the original, and has grammatical issues when used with "with".

in turn with

Implies a cause-and-effect relationship between the events, also has grammatical issues when used with "with".

succeeding with

This variant emphasizes that something follows directly after, but is still awkward with "with".

FAQs

How can I correctly use "subsequently" in a sentence?

Use "subsequently" to indicate that something happens after something else. For example: "The data was collected, and "subsequently" analyzed."

What can I use instead of "subsequently with"?

Instead of "subsequently with", use phrases like "subsequently followed by", "later with", or "afterward with" depending on the context.

Is the phrase "subsequently with" grammatically correct?

No, the phrase "subsequently with" is generally considered grammatically incorrect. It's better to use alternatives like "subsequently followed by" or to rephrase the sentence.

How does "subsequently" differ from "consequently"?

"Subsequently" indicates a sequence in time, while "consequently" indicates a cause-and-effect relationship. You would use "subsequently" to say that one event happened after another. "Consequently" suggests that the second event happened because of the first.