subsequently we

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "subsequently we" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something follows or occurs after a previous event or action. Example: "After reviewing the data, subsequently we decided to implement the new strategy."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

"Subsequently, we began conversations again" about the site, he said.

The New York Times

Subsequently, we learned of their bouts of misery, especially on tour.

The Guardian - Sport

Subsequently, we don't think that undergraduate applications will be significantly affected in the long-term.

The Guardian

But at that time we didn't have the evidence that subsequently we did have".

The Guardian

Subsequently we have seen fewer tourists in continental Europe, particularly Chinese tourists".

The Guardian - Business

Subsequently, we know our audience inside out, and have complete control over distribution.

The Guardian

He added: "Subsequently we got a specialist firm to do background checks".

The Guardian - Business

Subsequently, we developed key questions for discussion.

International Journal of Cardiology

Subsequently, we state the control design objectives.

Robotics and Biomimetics

We didn't do that, so subsequently we have got punished".

BBC

Subsequently, we give a generalization for arbitrary jobs.

Information Processing Letters

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "subsequently we" to clearly indicate a sequence of actions or steps, particularly in formal writing or when outlining a process.

Common error

Avoid using "subsequently we" in casual conversations or informal writing; simpler alternatives like "then we" or "after that we" are more appropriate.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "subsequently we" functions as an adverbial phrase followed by a pronoun, indicating a temporal relationship between actions. It modifies the verb that follows, specifying when the action occurred in relation to a previous event. Ludwig confirms its grammatical correctness and usability.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

62%

News & Media

28%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "subsequently we" is a grammatically correct and frequently used expression to indicate a sequence of actions or events, especially in formal and scientific writing. Ludwig confirms its validity. While versatile, it is best suited for contexts where clarity and structure are paramount. For less formal settings, consider alternatives like "after that we" or "then we". Remember to maintain consistency in your writing style and choose the phrase that best fits the tone and audience.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

thereafter we

Indicates a slightly more formal tone than "subsequently we".

afterward we

Similar in meaning but less frequently used than "subsequently we".

after that we

Presents a more direct and less formal alternative.

following that we

Offers a similar meaning but with a slightly different structural emphasis.

next we

Provides a simpler and more concise alternative.

then we

Represents a very common and informal way to indicate sequence.

in the aftermath we

Implies a consequence or result following an initial event.

as a consequence we

Highlights the cause-and-effect relationship more explicitly.

pursuant to that we

Introduces a formal or legalistic tone to the sequence.

in due course we

Suggests a natural or expected progression of events.

FAQs

How can I use "subsequently we" in a sentence?

Use "subsequently we" to indicate that something follows a previous action or event. For example, "We analyzed the data; subsequently we developed a new strategy".

What's a less formal alternative to "subsequently we"?

Alternatives include "after that we", "then we", or "next we", which are suitable for informal contexts.

Is "subsequently, we" grammatically different from "subsequently we"?

The comma after "subsequently" is optional but can enhance readability. Both "subsequently, we" and "subsequently we" are grammatically correct.

In what contexts is "subsequently we" most appropriate?

"Subsequently we" is well-suited for formal writing, reports, and academic papers where a clear sequence of events needs to be established. Less formal contexts may benefit from alternatives like "afterward we" or "following that we".