subsequently after

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "subsequently after" is not correct or commonly used in written English.
It is redundant and does not make sense in a sentence. You can simply use "after" or "subsequently" to convey the meaning of something happening at a later time. Incorrect usage: Subsequently after finishing my dinner, I went for a walk. Correct usage: After finishing my dinner, I went for a walk. OR Subsequently, I went for a walk.

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

And subsequently, after the fall of the Berlin Wall, there was the re-emergence of the Security Council.

The New York Times - Books

Subsequently, after much wrangling by politicians over the bogus issue of cultural elitism, the commission was withdrawn.

The New York Times - Magazine

Subsequently, after being criticized by consumers and antidiscrimination groups, both companies issued statements declaring their support for tolerance and diversity.

The New York Times

A photography lecturer, Carol nevertheless decided to turn the work into a research project and subsequently – after an exhibition was well received – into a website.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

Pt was deposited subsequently after TiN thin film deposition.

Surface and Coatings Technology

Subsequently, after just a few minutes of talking, an investment was put in motion.

TechCrunch

Subsequently, after the mold was pressurized, the mold was heated to melt the PCL powders.

Materials Science and Engineering: C

The nitrogen sources were depleted subsequently; after total exhaustion of ammonia consumption of nitrate started.

AMB Express

The recorded data, floating gate charge (Q FG), is read subsequently after fabrication [24, 25].

Nanoscale Research Letters

The inclined shear cracks were developed subsequently after the flexural yielding of longitudinal reinforcing bars.

International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials

For more than 200 patients, levels of PCT were determined only subsequently after discharge.

Annals of Intensive Care

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using "subsequently after" in your writing. Choose either "subsequently" or "after" to clearly indicate a sequence of events without redundancy.

Common error

Don't combine adverbs and prepositions that convey the same meaning. Using both "subsequently" and "after" creates unnecessary wordiness. Strive for concise and clear language.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "subsequently after" functions as an adverbial phrase intended to indicate temporal sequence. However, it is grammatically flawed due to redundancy, as both words serve a similar function. Ludwig AI indicates that this phrase is not considered correct.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

57%

News & Media

29%

Wiki

11%

Less common in

Formal & Business

3%

Reference

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "subsequently after" is a redundant construction that combines two words with similar meanings. Ludwig AI flags it as incorrect, advising users to choose either "subsequently" or "after" to indicate temporal sequence. While examples of its usage appear across various sources, including Science and News & Media, its grammatical incorrectness diminishes its effectiveness. For clearer and more concise writing, consider using alternatives like "subsequently", "afterward", or other options that avoid the unnecessary repetition.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

subsequently

This option eliminates redundancy by using a single adverb indicating sequence.

afterward

This suggests a slightly less formal but equally clear way to denote something that happens later.

later

This is a simple and direct alternative, suitable for most contexts.

following that

This option provides a more formal and explicit transition.

thereafter

This word offers a slightly more elevated or formal tone than “subsequently”.

in the aftermath

This choice focuses on the period following a specific event, highlighting consequence.

in due course

This signifies an event that will happen at the appropriate time, suggesting a natural progression.

down the line

This option suggests a future point in time, often after a series of developments.

at a later stage

This conveys that something will occur in a subsequent phase or step.

in the wake of

This focuses on what comes directly after a significant event, implying a causal connection.

FAQs

Is "subsequently after" grammatically correct?

No, "subsequently after" is grammatically incorrect and considered redundant. "Subsequently" and "after" both indicate a sequence in time, so using them together is unnecessary. Choose either "subsequently" or "after" to avoid this error.

When should I use "subsequently" or "after"?

Use "after" when you want to specify what event something follows. For example, "After the meeting, we went to lunch". Use "subsequently" to simply indicate that something happened at a later time, without needing to reference a specific event. For example, "The data was analyzed; subsequently, a report was written".

What are some alternatives to "subsequently after"?

Instead of "subsequently after", you can use single words or phrases such as "afterward", "later", "following that", or "thereafter". These alternatives avoid redundancy and maintain clarity.

Is it ever appropriate to use "subsequently after"?

No, there is no appropriate context for using "subsequently after". It is always considered redundant and should be avoided in both formal and informal writing. Opt for clearer, more concise alternatives.