subsequent to lunch

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "subsequent to lunch" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something occurs after the lunch period. Example: "We will hold the meeting subsequent to lunch to ensure everyone has had a chance to eat."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

There is wincing humor in that moment, but a fiercer brand awaits in a subsequent scene, when Mary comes to lunch only to discover that the object of her desire has found a girlfriend.

The New York Times

Subsequent to Newton, much has been amended.

Wikipedia

The gels were dried subsequent to autoradiography.

Plosone

Morning fasting reduced satiety hormone responses to a subsequent lunch meal but counterintuitively also reduced concentrations of the appetite-stimulating hormone-acylated ghrelin during the afternoon relative to lunch consumed after breakfast.

Nature

He went to lunch.

The New York Times

Going to "lunch"?

The New Yorker

He asked her to lunch.

The New Yorker

Wednesday: Professor Nietzsche to lunch.

The New Yorker

Friends invited me to lunch.

The New York Times

Let's go to lunch".

The New Yorker

I asked you to lunch..."....

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "subsequent to lunch" when aiming for a formal or academic tone. In less formal contexts, consider using simpler alternatives like "after lunch".

Common error

Avoid using "subsequent to lunch" in casual conversation or informal writing. Its formality can sound unnatural in everyday contexts.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "subsequent to lunch" functions as a prepositional phrase, modifying a verb or noun by indicating the timing of an event or action. It specifies that something occurs in the period following the midday meal.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

30%

News & Media

30%

Formal & Business

20%

Less common in

Wiki

10%

Encyclopedias

5%

Reference

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "subsequent to lunch" is a grammatically correct prepositional phrase used to indicate that something happens after lunch. Ludwig AI confirms this. Although its usage is infrequent, it is suitable for formal and scientific contexts where precision is valued. Simpler alternatives like "after lunch" are more appropriate for informal settings. When using this phrase, consider the tone and audience to ensure it aligns with the overall communication style.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

after lunch

A more common and direct way to express the same timing.

immediately following lunch

Highlights the lack of delay after the lunch period.

directly after lunch

Emphasizes immediacy compared to the more general timeframe implied by "subsequent to lunch".

following lunch

Similar in meaning but slightly less formal than "subsequent to lunch".

once lunch is over

Similar to 'after lunch' but emphasizes the completion of the meal.

post-lunch

A concise, slightly informal way to indicate what happens after lunch.

upon completion of lunch

More formal and emphasizes the finished state of lunch.

in the afternoon

A broader timeframe, less precise than "subsequent to lunch".

later that day

Even more general, indicating something happened later, but not necessarily directly after lunch.

the lunch concludes

Focuses on the end of the lunch period as a starting point.

FAQs

What does "subsequent to lunch" mean?

The phrase "subsequent to lunch" means happening or coming after the lunch period. It's a formal way of saying "after lunch" or "following lunch".

When should I use "subsequent to lunch"?

Use "subsequent to lunch" in formal writing, such as academic papers or business reports, where a more sophisticated tone is appropriate. For everyday conversation, simpler alternatives like "after lunch" are preferable.

What are some alternatives to "subsequent to lunch"?

Alternatives to "subsequent to lunch" include "after lunch", "following lunch", "post-lunch", or simply specifying the time frame, such as "in the afternoon".

Is "subsequent to lunch" grammatically correct?

Yes, "subsequent to lunch" is grammatically correct. The word "subsequent" is an adjective meaning 'coming after something in time', and the preposition "to" correctly links it to the noun "lunch".