Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
There were no significant missing differences concerning child age and gender, Kidcope frequency (20.3%-22.8%) and subordinate efficacy (22.0%-29.3%).
Similar(59)
Through an encouraging and supportive attitude, superiors can strengthen their subordinates' self-efficacy and thus foster personal efforts for the achievement of organizational goals: the "can-do" component of motivation.
As well, subordinate creative self-efficacy moderates the relationship between team creative efficacy and subordinate OCB in such a way that when team creative efficacy is high, subordinates who perceive that their creative self-efficacy is low are more willing to practice OCB.
When subordinates' team creative efficacy is high, they are motivated to achieve team creative goals.
With increased team creative efficacy, subordinates will have more motivation to put effort into their work, such as supporting the team, to pursue creative goals.
Moreover, creative self-efficacy moderates the relationships between perceived team creative efficacy and subordinate OCB.
Therefore, we test the following predictions: Hypothesis 3: Subordinates' perceived creative self-efficacy moderates the relationship between team creative efficacy and subordinates' OCB in such a way that when perceived creative self-efficacy is low the positive relationship between team creative efficacy and subordinates' OCB becomes stronger.
Hypothesis 3: Subordinates' perceived creative self-efficacy moderates the relationship between team creative efficacy and subordinates' OCB in such a way that when perceived creative self-efficacy is low the positive relationship between team creative efficacy and subordinates' OCB becomes stronger.
As a result, subordinates' perceived team creative efficacy will rise.
As a result, the team creative efficacy of subordinates will increase.
Consistent with social cognitive theory, we propose that a subordinate's creative self-efficacy may make the difference.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com