submitted for review

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "submitted for review" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used in contexts where a document, proposal, or piece of work is being presented for evaluation or feedback. Example: "The manuscript has been submitted for review by the editorial board."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

57 human-written examples

Their compensation has been submitted for review to Kenneth Feinberg, the government's pay czar.

The New York Times

The first, which he submitted for review, lacked the mug shot.

The New Yorker

Just five of the offices generated about 40percentt of the death penalty cases submitted for review.

The New York Times

Still others, including a voter identification law in Alabama, have been passed into law but not yet submitted for review.

The New York Times

And then there's the cupboard at the Guardian/Observer offices where spare copies of all the books submitted for review are kept.

The Guardian - Books

About 40percentt of the 682 death-penalty cases submitted for review came from five of the United States attorney districts.

The New York Times

The board granted him parole in 2011 but reversed its decision, saying it received new information not previously submitted for review.

The Guardian

The deal has been submitted for review, but ultimately nobody expects the Majlis to defy the supreme leader on such a crucial issue.

The Guardian

Ms. Davidson said it took the C.I.A. four months to grant its approval after the book was submitted for review in January.

The New York Times

A Pentagon spokesman said Thursday that the information had not been submitted for review by the Department of Defense and that it should have been.

The New York Times

The figure was to be submitted for review for the Guinness Book of World Records.... Robinson Cano extended his hitting streak to 22 games.

The New York Times - Sports

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Prefer active voice. For example, instead of saying "The application was submitted for review", say "The applicant submitted the application for review".

Common error

Avoid using "submitted for review" in a way that obscures who performed the action of submitting. Unclear passive voice can make sentences vague and less impactful.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "submitted for review" functions as a verb phrase, typically used as part of a passive construction. It indicates the action of presenting something for evaluation. As Ludwig AI indicates, the phrase is considered grammatically correct and widely used.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Science

35%

Formal & Business

15%

Less common in

Wiki

5%

Reference

3%

Encyclopedias

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "submitted for review" is a grammatically sound and frequently employed verb phrase, indicating that something has been presented for evaluation or assessment. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is widely accepted. Its prevalence spans across diverse contexts, notably in news, scientific, and formal business domains. When employing this phrase, clarity regarding the reviewer and the submission's originator is paramount. To improve sentence impact, the active voice is favored over passive constructions. While alternatives such as "presented for consideration" or "handed in for assessment" exist, the choice depends on the specific nuance intended.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

presented for consideration

Focuses on the act of presenting something to be thought about, rather than explicitly reviewed.

handed in for assessment

Emphasizes the act of physically or digitally submitting something for evaluation.

lodged for evaluation

Implies formally placing something for official judgement.

forwarded for inspection

Highlights the act of sending something along a chain of command to be checked.

referred for scrutiny

Indicates something is being passed to another entity for careful and critical examination.

tabled for discussion

Suggests the item is formally placed before a group for conversation and debate.

offered for critique

Highlights the solicitation of feedback, with a focus on critical feedback.

given for analysis

Emphasizes the handover to someone so that they can break something down in order to understand it better.

circulated for feedback

Focuses on broadly distributing something to gather input and opinions.

referred for approval

Focuses on obtaining official sanction or agreement.

FAQs

What does "submitted for review" mean?

The phrase "submitted for review" means that something has been formally presented to someone or a group for them to examine, assess, and provide feedback or a decision on.

What are some alternatives to "submitted for review"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives such as "presented for consideration", "handed in for assessment", or "referred for scrutiny".

Is it better to use active or passive voice with "submitted for review"?

While both active and passive voice are grammatically correct, using the active voice (e.g., "The author submitted the manuscript for review") is often clearer and more direct than the passive voice (e.g., "The manuscript was submitted for review").

What is the difference between "submitted for review" and "submitted for approval"?

"Submitted for review" implies an examination and feedback process, while "submitted for approval" suggests the primary goal is to obtain authorization or agreement. Review might precede approval, but they are distinct stages.