Sentence examples for submissions were evaluated from inspiring English sources

Some of these VXDS submissions were evaluated jointly by the FDA and European Medicines Agency EMAA).

After the challenge, submissions were evaluated against the true topology based on the area under the precision-recall curve (AUPR) and the area under the receiver-operator characteristics curve (AUROC).

The first scoring method involved the use of a published network inference algorithm (Mitsos et al., 2009) to generate a 'silver standard' network against which all submissions were evaluated.

The mean overall impact score and individual grant scores for each applicant on the first and second submissions were evaluated using a one-tailed Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test.

Submissions are evaluated by representatives from the Aldrich and the Guild; currently they are Mónica Ramírez-Montagut, the curator at the Aldrich, and Debra K. Browne, the Guild's exhibitions director.

Submissions are evaluated in a triple-blind process of peer review.

This will assure that all submissions are evaluated according to the same criteria.

For the Discussion section, each submission was evaluated based on these rubric questions: 1) Have you drawn clear conclusions from the model simulations?

For the Introduction section, each submission was evaluated based on how well it addressed the following three rubric questions: 1) Have you explained the significance of the problem? 2) Have you stated the hypothesis that the model will test?

For the Results section, each submission was evaluated based on how well it addressed these rubric questions: 1) Have you described the results you obtained and compared them to the results obtained with the original model?

For the Model Description section, each submission was evaluated based on how well it addressed the following three rubric questions: 1) Have you provided a brief overview of the key state variables, parameters, and inputs to the model?