Suggestions(2)
Exact(1)
We enjoyed @WolmanTweets's bipartisan, lousy-with-double-negative submission, "Agree or don't not disagree?
Similar(59)
Still, as of Thursday, 67 users had voted positively on the submission, essentially agreeing that it should count against Google.
Some authors like to go away and quietly write their masterpiece and then submit their manuscript, complete and in the format requested, exactly on the submission date agreed.
Our employer is aware of the submission and agrees to it.
The following individuals responsible for the peer review of your submission have agreed to reveal their identity: Randy Schekman and Reid Gilmore.
The following individual involved in review of your submission has agreed to reveal his identity: Patrick Simen (Reviewer).
The following individuals responsible for the peer review of your submission have agreed to reveal their identity: Volker Dötsch, Raimund Dutzler.
The following individuals responsible for the peer review of your submission have agreed to reveal their identity: J Richard McIntosh and Helder Maiato.
The following individuals responsible for the peer review of your submission have agreed to reveal their identity: Jean Greenberg (Reviewing editor).
The following individual responsible for the peer review of your submission has agreed to reveal her identity: Ruth Lehmann, Reviewing editor.
The following individual involved in review of your submission has agreed to reveal his identity: Alexey Merz (peer reviewer).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com