Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(3)
Specifically, we model different cognitive strategies that have been observed for human subjects solving the Tower of Hanoi problem.
The stress task was adapted from one previously demonstrated to induce mental stress and headache [20], and involved subjects solving anagrams and arithmetic problems, presented via computer monitor.
In comparison between subjects solving the case on computer and those solving the case with paper and pencil, the Chi-square test was used for variables measured on a nominal scale.
Similar(57)
In a 1996 study, researchers at Macalester College and New York University had subjects solve 60 anagrams and rate how difficult each one would be for others to solve.
There were no differences in the average success rate of calculating: On average, both patients and subjects solved 70% of the arithmetic tasks correctly.
Results from a study using this technique are used to measure on line glucose uptake while subjects solve problems in a Raven test.
When we presented the boxes with the functional rope, we found no effect of having been exposed to a model on the probability that subjects solved the task.
If the subjects solved Phase 1 by attending to the functionality of the problem (i.e. the physical/causal relationship between the cloth and food), then reversing the colours in Phase 2 should have no effect on the subjects' performances.
In another experiment with 93 undergraduates and a larger sample of 148 American adults recruited online, some subjects solved word puzzles that incorporated words such as "analyze," "reason," and "ponder," while others completed similar puzzles with only words unrelated to thinking, such as "high" and "plane".
Once the subjects reached criterion, we reversed the association between the cloth colour and the food reward in Phase 2. If the subjects solved the problems in Phase 1 by attending to cloth colour, then in Phase 2 they should have difficulty, especially given prior findings on tamarins demonstrating that reversal learning is difficult.
How subjects solve this problem is explored in the experiment.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com