Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(60)
There is evidence that momentary mood influences subjects' responses to subjective well-being questions (Schwarz and Clore 1983).
To avoid such confusion, you should strive for basic understanding but need not be overly fastidious in doing so when the subjects' responses will not vary.
Yet the research goes further: it reveals that the difference in the test subjects' responses to "art" and "reality" was one of intensity.
Its researchers instead studied behavior in laboratories, observing and recording test subjects' responses to carefully administered stimuli.
They discovered that they could influence the subjects' responses by spinning a wheel of fortune in front of them to generate a random number: when a big number turned up, the estimates suddenly swelled.
In a paper that has yet to be published, they demonstrate that the riskiness of these portfolios, too, was strongly correlated with subjects' responses in the lottery game.
The subjects' responses were recorded every second minute for a total period of 10 min.
Finally, Poling and Evans (2004) reported statistical analyses of their subjects' responses to their questions.
Optimization of contrast efficiency is a complicated issue whenever subjects' responses are not deterministic but probabilistic.
Testing was done using the MACarena [12] software which allowed randomized sound presentation and automatic recording of subjects' responses.
Although the model is fit to the actual programmed states of the agents, and not to subjects' responses, its output actually conforms better to subjects' responses than to the ground truth goal state of the agents.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com