Sentence examples for subjects reduction from inspiring English sources

As shown in Table 11, and similar to findings in nondiabetic subjects, reduction in "hard" CVD outcomes (CHD death and nonfatal MI) can be more clearly seen in diabetic subjects with high baseline CVD risk (known CVD and/or very high LDL cholesterol levels), but overall the benefits of statin therapy in people with diabetes at moderate or high risk for CVD are convincing.

Similar to findings in nondiabetic subjects, reduction in "hard" CVD outcomes (CHD death and nonfatal MI) can be more clearly seen in diabetic subjects with high baseline CVD risk (known CVD and/or very high LDL cholesterol levels), but overall the benefits of statin therapy in people with diabetes at moderate or high risk for CVD are convincing.

For both older and younger subjects, reductions from baseline to week 24 in PPG-AUC0 180 PPG-AUC0 180and the percentage of patients andieving HbA1c < 7% atheeek 24 were greater with saxaglipercentagewith placebof in the patientstudies.

Reconfiguration consistency is obtained as subject reduction: as long as cutting and pasting typing proofs still yields typing proofs, subject reduction is guaranteed.

The Church Rosser property ensures that computation in the trust (lambda )-calculus is deterministic and subject reduction guarantees that reduction preserves typing [2, 20].

We also prove subject reduction and type safety results, which justify our claim that our language is statically type checked and does not throw basic runtime type errors.

After proving subject reduction, we establish the progress property: once a communication has been established, well-typed programs will never starve at communication points.

We define a language LGM supporting generalized matching, its typing rules, and its operational semantics and establish a subject reduction theorem showing the soundness of the system.

This differs from the approach adopted in [38], where the semantics of the trust (lambda )-calculus is formalised using a reduction semantics, with no predefined order of evaluation, and the Church Rosser property and a subject reduction theorem are proved.

With the before-and-after study design, a mean within-subject reduction in PM2.5 exposure concentration of 92 μg/m was attained and subjects served as their own controls, eliminating concern of confounding by between-subject differences.

Forty percent of subjects showed reduction of two steps or more of vitreous haze (four in each group), and 60% showed a reduction of one-step vitreous haze (seven in group 1 and five in group 2).