The results of this survey show the direction of Maker Movement research during recent years and the most common technologies, subjects, evaluation methods, and pedagogical designs.
The mean scores of the subjects' evaluation criteria regarding the two impression techniques were significantly different (p < 0.001).
Subjects' evaluation includes visual acuity measurement, scotoma delineation, identification of spontaneously developed PRLs and characterization of oculomotor behavior during reading.
Subjects' evaluation of earplugs and eye masks is listed in Table 4. Overall, they rated the devices highly, as very comfortable, very helpful and very easy to use.
The mean total treatment time (p < 0.001) and the subjects' evaluation scores (p < 0.001) regarding the impression techniques were significantly different (Tables 1 and 2).
AN helped with subject evaluations.
Within-subject evaluations were performed for walking, sweeping, and standing.
PC participated with subject evaluations and planning and participated in analysis, interpretation of the data and in the study planning.
We thank: Evelyn Lee for coordination of the subject evaluations, samples and subject data; the SFGH/UCSF CRC staff for their assistance; and the subjects for generously volunteering for the studies.
