Sentence examples for subjects confidence from inspiring English sources

At its best (as in "Manakamana"), the camera's bland insistence inspires the subjects' confidence and captures their revelatory gestures and inflections; elsewhere (as in "Leviathan"), the data seems to fit a preconceived but unexpressed thesis.

Multiple hierarchical regression analyses revealed that the subjects' confidence in their ability to perform a range of tasks despite pain (assessed at baseline), was predictive of total pain behaviour and avoidance behaviour over the nine-month study period.

Figure 9 shows perceived figure height −50% PSE thresholds averaged across the participants – by size, figure type, and eye movement condition with error bars showing 95% within subjects confidence intervals [17].

Methods such as the Remember/Know technique (Tulving 1985), source memory paradigm (Johnson et al. 1993), and recording the subjects' confidence level would be beneficial (e.g., Kim and Cabeza 2007).

For this same reason we predict that the assessments given on the verbal scale will differ from those given on the double scale or the numerical scale, but that the vagueness provided by the verbal scale will increase the subjects' confidence in their assessments.

The scale scored study subjects' confidence in terms of their personal beliefs in their ability to give birth, their behaviour being based on their own decisions, their ability and confidence to cope with difficulties, and their confidence in delivering babies vaginally.

Fig. 8 Mean percentage of undetected changes (panel a) and mean detection speed (in ms; panel b) in each condition of Experiment 2. Error bars represent 95% within-subject confidence intervals calculated with Masson and Loftus's (2003) method.

Figure 2 shows the mean proportions of pixels required for making object size decisions in each experimental and control condition (error bars denote 95% within-subjects confidence intervals [44]).

Figure 3 shows the performance on the old/new recognition test in terms of correct decisions for studied items and false alarms for non-studied items (error bars denote 95% within-subjects confidence intervals [44]).

As in Experiment 1, the between-subject confidence contrast on the first item was not significant for the correctly solved conflict items, F 1, 89) = 1.77, p = .19.19

Subject and physician satisfaction levels were similarly high for both products, and product change was rare and most often simply because the usual product was unavailable at the time, reflecting physician and subject confidence and satisfaction with both products.