Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(16)
Interestingly, with 40 mg/day atorvastatin treatment the increase in EPC was higher in subjects categorized as NYHA class II compared to subjects categorized as NYHA class III (p = 0.03).
However, a longitudinal follow-up performed for 17 LTBI subjects suggests that the subjects categorized as LTBI resulting from a remote infection remained positive and were thus true LTBI cases.
Subjects categorized as Pain must have presented with pain in (at least) the knee with radiographic evidence of OA.
Subjects categorized as being outside the workforce included mainly homemakers, those who were unemployed, students and disability pensioners.
Statistical differences were found in subjects categorized as having radiographic signs of OA and altered lower limb alignment (p = 0.03).
In all cases, observed changes in the RSDI were statistically significant compared to subjects categorized as the 'same' relative to baseline.
Similar(44)
A subject categorized as GORD symptom negative experienced either infrequent or no symptoms [ 26]. *Each symptom was asked in relation to meals using a 5-point Likert scale for frequency and a 4-point Likert scale for severity e.g. for heartburn.
Considering only go responses towards targets, accuracy scores were slightly lower when subjects categorized birds as birds (basic level: 97.2%) than as animals (superordinate level: 98.5%; χ2, p<0.05; paired t-test, p = 0.001, t = 3.961).
The present report targeted the assessment of differences in the cardiovascular risk profiles of subjects categorized differently as having or not having diabetes with diagnostic criteria based on plasma glucose and A1C.
In the categorization condition, subjects categorized each face as Chinese or African American.
If subjects categorized a stimulus as neither/nor, P1 amplitudes were larger compared to when they categorized the stimulus as flower or spider, t 89) = -2.75, p =.007, with no difference between flower and spider categorizations, t 89) =.65, p =.52.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com