"subjective range" is a valid and usable phrase in written English.
You can use it to refer to the range of opinions and preferences expressed by individuals or groups, or to a particular set of possibilities that depend on individual perspectives. For example, "It's difficult to find a system that works for everyone; there's a wide subjective range when it comes to people's opinions on the best way to organize their work."
How can we bring an essentiallly subjective range of judgments nomologically into line with a range of empirical judgments?
We utilized the so-called Safe-Range-Inventory (SRI), a multidimensional assessment tool for capturing multi-facets of subjective range safety assessments.
Higher route familiarity, trust in the range estimation system, system knowledge, subjective range competence, and internal control beliefs in dealing with technology were clearly related to lower experienced range stress; emotional stability (i.e., low neuroticism) was partly related to lower range stress.
The IRS rules -- the ones that matter for purposes of tax-exempt status -- lay out a more expansive, and more subjective, range of relevant political activity.
That's very subjective — the range depends on which mode, the incline, weight of the rider and throttle usage.
Eliciting subjective distributions: range of variation Various elements need to be specified when formulating questions to obtain subjective distributions.
This presupposes that the anchors possess natural positions in the subjective dynamic range and also "numerical" inter-relations.
The OMS was initially conceived to provide a functional assessment tool following an ankle fracture and was tested against subjective evaluation, range of motion, presence of osteoarthritis and severity of initial injury [40].
Moreover, the complaints had to be associated with a subjective decreased range of vision.
Here's an admittedly subjective sampling, ranging from the important to the trivial.
Although (absent horizontal gene transfer and speciation by hybridization) Hennig's goal is objective and unambiguous, using the algorithm for inferring such phylogenies requires subjective judgments ranging from assessing simplicity to selecting appropriate outgroups and characteristics to analyze.
