Subjective familiarity ratings were used to capture variation in participants' familiarity with a location, as opposed to an objective recognition task that do not capture variation in certainty.
To maximize differences in familiarity and minimize any label ambiguities resulting from the subjective familiarity scores, only the data from the listening session with the most (i.e., familiarity level 6) and least (i.e., familiarity level 1) familiar samples in our dataset were used to perform the analysis.
The present study is not alone in finding that this CBM-I procedure can change the subjective familiarity of emotional foils as well as targets in this recognition task.
In addition, the same analysis for subjective familiarity ratings identified positive correlations with bilateral ventral striatum, ventral tegmental area (VTA), PHG, insula, as well as anterior STG and motor cortex (Table 3).
Finally, we expected that, compared with pretending to know and correct rejection, false recognition would be associated with greater activity in the medial temporal lobe structures responsible for subjective familiarity and with no reactivation of regions involved in the sensory processing of auditory materials.
Note that matching distractor items for rhyme-level information that was presented multiple times within each attentional focus condition likely increases the subjective familiarity of these distractor items, as it presents conditions known to induce false memories (Deese 1959; Sommers and Lewis 1999).
Twelve variables, including objective and rated AoA, the percentage of name agreement, H value, concept agreement, concept familiarity, subjective word frequency, image agreement, image variability, visual complexity, word length and naming latency, were made available for 435 line-drawing object pictures.
When comparing the relative contributions of objective AoA and rated AoA during picture naming task, eight other variables, including concept familiarity, subjective word frequency, image agreement, image variability, the percentage of name agreement, concept agreement, word length, and visual complexity, were first entered as predictors in the regression analysis.
These data include naming latency, name agreement, concept agreement, word length, and age of acquisition (AoA) based on children's naming and adult ratings, and several other adult ratings of concept familiarity, subjective word frequency, image agreement, image variability, and visual complexity.
Seek agreement that collaborative team members will engage in a process of self-reflection through dialogue and writing to acknowledge subjective bias, values, familiarity, agendas, taken-for-granted assumptions and perceptions about the contextual issues and cultural influences associated with the research setting [ 8, 10, 11].
Both AoA indices correlate with concept familiarity and subjective frequency to a comparable level.
