Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(5)
The mean measurements for each subject were compared between the early and late groups using Welch Two Sample t tests (Table 1) with no difference seen.
Data for individual subjects were averaged and the means within a subject were compared across subjects.
To examine differences in immunobiological processes between the FGT mucosal surface and blood, CMCs and PBMCs from the same subject were compared using whole genome expression arrays.
In a second level random effects group analysis, individual regionally specific effects of conditions for each subject were compared using a within-subject ANOVA (2×2 design with the factors regulation condition (regulation, no regulation) and valence (negative, neutral) with non-sphericity correction resulting in a t-statistic for every voxel.
All other data (with only a single data point per subject) were compared by a paired two-tailed t test (Prism 6.02 for Windows, GraphPad Software Inc, La Jolla, CA, USA).
Similar(55)
Motor control evaluation in subjects with functional ankle instability is questionable when both ankles of the same subject are compared (affected vs non-affected).
For CNV detection on the X chromosome, each subject was compared with a reference set comprising the remaining subjects of the same gender on the same plate.
Baseline impedance in each subject was compared using a paired t-test.
The rate of events per subject was compared between groups using the Poisson model test (20).
Each subject was compared with his/herself at different time windows, before and after multisensory and cognitive stimulation.
The spatially normalized FDG-PET scan for each subject was compared with a normative reference database generated from the FDG-PET scans of normal individuals.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com