The phrase "subject to proof" is correct and usable in written English.
It is generally used to express a statement that must be proven before it can be accepted as true. For example, "The accused is innocent, subject to proof."
But did the Babylonians conceive of it as a "theorem" — a timeless truth subject to proof based on accepted principles?
So let us begin anew - remembering on both sides that civility is not a sign of weakness, and sincerity is always subject to proof.
As a UK citizen you can visit South Africa for up to 90 days without a visa, subject to proof you can support yourself during that time (you may need to show bank statements and/or payslips).
Still, a number of lines that sing in the final version are first heard here: "Civility is not a sign of weakness, and sincerity is subject to proof "; "For only when our arms are sufficient beyond doubt can we be certain beyond doubt that they will never be employed"; "All this will not be finished in the first hundred days..
But that solace may be short lived: a spokesman for the financial arm of Swiss Post, Marc Andrey, also told NZZ am Sonntag on Sunday that it was "reviewing" its relationship with Mr. Assange subject to proof that he has Swiss residency, owns property or does business in the country.
Still, a number of lines that sing in the final version are first heard here: "Civility is not a sign of weakness, and sincerity is subject to proof "; "For only when our arms are sufficient beyond doubt can we be certain beyond doubt that they will never be employed"; "All this will not be finished in the first hundred days...
This proof is strikingly similar both in structure and in subject to modern proofs of the redundancy of axioms in a system.
Such measures appear laudable but should be subject to crime proofing, that is, the system should be checked to ensure it does not provide additional crime opportunities.
God, also, is not subject to strict verifiable proof.
This is a reasonable assumption and subject to a simple proof that need not be shown here.
(The company, which has since changed its name to PharmaNet Development Group, says that it required subjects to provide proof of their legal status, and that the practice of medicine wasn't part of the medical director's duties. Last August, the company paid $28.5 million to settle a class-action lawsuit).
