Suggestions(1)
Exact(3)
Korshak, in an ironic twist on the movie's subject, solved another critical problem when Coppola's demand that the film be shot in New York caused mobsters to shut the movie out of locations throughout the boroughs and Long Island.
Based on the automatic analysis of several behavior indices, three strategies were identified: global and analytic, but also "synthetic," in which the subject solved the problem by relying on gestalts.
Nevertheless, only one subject solved the task after 100 trials.
Similar(57)
However, it has been argued that the purest test case in this respect concerns a between-subject experiment in which each subject solves only one single problem [29], [30].
To test for spatial and/or order associations of the subject solving the gaze following task, we examined a subject's responses to catch trials in the two control experiments.
There were no differences in the average success rate of calculating: On average, both patients and subjects solved 70% of the arithmetic tasks correctly.
When we presented the boxes with the functional rope, we found no effect of having been exposed to a model on the probability that subjects solved the task.
If the subjects solved Phase 1 by attending to the functionality of the problem (i.e. the physical/causal relationship between the cloth and food), then reversing the colours in Phase 2 should have no effect on the subjects' performances.
In another experiment with 93 undergraduates and a larger sample of 148 American adults recruited online, some subjects solved word puzzles that incorporated words such as "analyze," "reason," and "ponder," while others completed similar puzzles with only words unrelated to thinking, such as "high" and "plane".
Once the subjects reached criterion, we reversed the association between the cloth colour and the food reward in Phase 2. If the subjects solved the problems in Phase 1 by attending to cloth colour, then in Phase 2 they should have difficulty, especially given prior findings on tamarins demonstrating that reversal learning is difficult.
All three subjects solved the three-tool problem (Tertiary; see Video S3) on at least some trials, and all had higher rates of success on the second block of these trials (Tertiary-2; Corbeau: 30% vs 69%, n = 23 trials; Pierre: 70% vs 100%, n = 20; Uék: 40% vs 62%, n = 23).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com