Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigThe phrase "subject of are" is not correct in English and does not convey a clear meaning.
It seems to be an incomplete or incorrect construction that lacks context for proper usage. Example: "The subject of are the students who participated in the survey." (This example is still incorrect; the phrase itself is flawed.)
Exact(1)
(In this construction, the subject of "are" is "both," not "who").
Similar(59)
De Sica was an expert on the subject of being disregarded.
On the subject of being a "grande dame" Moreau gives an indignant snort.
It also offers plenty of opportunities to bring up the subject of being a girl...permanently.
The constituting subject of treaties are states, and the constituting subject of constitutions is the individual.
But the question of how it is that these systems are subjects of experience is perplexing.
Make it "who," the subject of "was".
Make it "who," the subject of "is".
"Who," not "whom"; it's the subject of "was".
"That" functions as the object of "has," but as the subject of "was hidden".
Recorded announcement: Make it "who," not "whom," the subject of "was".
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com