After a basal LEP evaluation, each subject was submitted to the rTMS and sham sessions in a random sequence over two consecutive days.
Each pair, composed by one Green and one Yellow subject, was submitted to an experimental session lasting approximately 30 minutes.
Images comparing Humorous trials against Non-Humorous trials (Humorous>Non-Humorous, one per subject) were submitted to a random effects model to determine brain regions that showed greater activation during humorous compared to non-humorous events.
Each subject was submitted to carotid artery Doppler ultrasound examination.
Every subject was submitted to an ultrasonographic evaluation of the skin at 0, 40, and 60 days of therapy.
Each subject was submitted to a home-based interview by a trained operator, with the administration of a structured questionnaire, validated at European level.
Error rates are presented in Figure 2 B. As with RTs, error rates within each condition and subject were submitted to a 2 × 3 repeated-measures ANOVA.
Each subject was submitted to LBT (EC 60 Gastrolyzer 2, Bedfont Scientific, Rochester, UK) following a 3 day low carbohydrate diet, overnight fasting, and chlorhexidine mouthwash.
All names for each CHDS subject were submitted for cancer linkages using fixed (i.e., birth date, sex, race, and name) and changeable (i.e., address and patient record number) identifiers.
We postulate the existence of a cohort exposed to asbestos, for which each subject was submitted to a TDM at some time t since his/her first exposure to asbestos.
