Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(3)
A within subject driving simulator experiment tested six combinations of clear zone widths and roadside vegetation densities.
This partially explains his hesitation in writing on the subject of human evolution but it always remained the subject driving his thinking, and he never lost sight of the ultimate goal of tackling human evolution.
This paper presents a combined lateral and longitudinal driver model developed based on human subject driving simulator experiments that is able to identify different driver behaviors through driver model parameter identification.
Similar(56)
We further examined two separate groups of the ego-subjects; driving and transit.
For our ego-subjects, driving is the choice of 67 subjects while transit is the choice of 33 subjects.
Several aspects of driving behavior were then compared between the human subjects' driving in the "virtual" and the real world.
We also cannot exclude a relationship with gender as the only two female participants were the two older subjects driving this correlation.
With this transport mode inference algorithm, we have found that for all 5,405 subjects, driving is the mode choice of 4,500 subjects while transit is the choice of 905 subjects, which account for 83.26% (driving) and 16.74% (transit).
As illustrated in Fig. 2, +history subjects' driving performance worsened almost 2.5 SDs from euglycemia to hypoglycemia, whereas −history subjects demonstrated no driving impairment, driving slightly (but not significantly) better during hypoglycemia.
Among glaucoma subjects, driving cessation became more likely with more severe VF loss (OR = 2.0 for each 5 dB decrement in the better-eye MD; 95% CI = 1.4-2.9; p < 0.001).
This is likely due to the fact that, in the standard PET approach, one subject is driving the average, while with NLME modeling, the model is less sensitive to one subject as all data are analyzed simultaneously.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com