Exact(2)
An expert (Y.W., S.o.L ., blinded to the group status of subject, checked and if necessary manually corrected the automatic segmentations.
For each question, the subject checked a box on a 5-point scale, where the middle option (0) indicated a neutral response and the lower (−2) and higher (+2) options indicated a negative or positive response, respectively.
Similar(58)
If you want a complete perspective on the subject, check it out.
Here's more, a piece I wrote last year about this subject; check it out.
The first school day following the initial application of dimethicone, the school nurse examined the subject, checking for live lice and viable eggs while visually inspecting the condition of the child's scalp.
When the subjects checked out the next day, their hands were swabbed and rhinovirus was detected, said the researchers, who presented their findings at a recent Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.
During this process, the subjects checked the design errors (see Figure 7 for an example).
The subjects checked one of the five responses (0 = none; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = severe; and 4 = very).
Subjects checked in by 5 00 p.m. and met with the study team, which confirmed that the subjects had brought their insulin, pump supplies, and regular medications.
WDRS subjects checked blood glucose more often (mean 4.8vs.1.9.9 checks per day) and were more likely to use lipid-lowering medications (22.6% vs. 2.2%) than the WESDR subjects with blood glucose check and lipid medication data.
(On this subject, check out Stephen Glain's recent essay, "The American Leviathan" in the Nation magazine).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com