Sentence examples for styles of reasoning from inspiring English sources

The relatively few experiments conducted in non-Western cultures suggest that the minds of American students are highly unusual in many respects, including their spatial cognition, responses to optical illusions, styles of reasoning, coöperative behavior, ideas of fairness, and risk-taking strategies.

Bernard Williams' "relativism of distance" (Williams 1985) and Ian Hacking's (1982) defense of variability in styles of reasoning are instances of weak relativism.

These include not only inference patterns with special vocabulary from mathematics, philosophy, and linguistics but also new styles of reasoning coming from computer science and artificial intelligence.

But if, in the historicist spirit, this historical fact is understood to underpin the claim that the acceptability of "styles of reasoning" varies across time then, if a Kuhnian revolution brings with it a shift in the preferred styles of reasoning, there may not be a single conception of rationality that can be used to compare the problem-solving capacities of the competing paradigms.

While Tsongkhapa's model espouses one specific view that must be cultivated in one specific way, Gorampa's model leaves open the possibility for different practitioners to employ different styles of reasoning.

Gorampa's articulation of the idea that there are different styles of reasoning that are capable of leading to enlightenment on the Buddhist path exists in the context of his assessment of the difference between the so-called Prāsaṅgika and Svātantrika schools of Madhyamaka thought.

He played a key part in the international public relations of the federal government during the civil war, calling on his quietly effective style of reasoning and his skills as a communicator.

The new experimental reasoning was qualitatively different from the Euclidean style of reasoning adopted by Stevin.

Hence there was much resistance among physicists to the new style of reasoning.

But if Mill's style of reasoning and writing was plain and unadorned, it was at least clear and cogent.

Conversely, if we begin by choosing a certain kind of object to explain, we are obliged to use the style of reasoning associated with that kind of object.