"style rotation" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
It can be used to refer to the practice of introducing a variety of different styles when completing certain tasks. For example, "To keep things interesting, they decided to use a style rotation when decorating the room, with each person taking turns to choose what kind of decorations were used."
Current, which was formerly known (if at all) for an unpredictable, YouTube-style rotation of videos, is undergoing a reformatting by Mark Rosenthal, a former MTV president who was named chief executive of Current last year.
Our results have significant relevance to postgraduate medical training, where traditionally short, block-style rotations limit exposure to the wide range of patient problems and logistic difficulties and demands for increasing faculty productivity challenge traditional teaching efforts.
The work of Chu and Kita (2011) stands out as an example of this methodology: the authors first manipulated between subjects whether participants were encouraged to gesture on a Shepard and Metzler-style block rotation task.
The Irregular Magic IQ Cube, the new rotation style, the new format in each face, the new Rubik shape!
With the effects of the Swinging Sixties yet to be fully felt, the twist was initially deemed to be vulgar and obscene for similar reasons to the Charleston – the dance could be performed without a partner and had its roots in the African-American style of hip rotation.
This rotation style format exposes students to a wide variety of proteomics and mass spectrometry concepts, while maintaining the continuity required to effectively experience an application-based workflow from sample preparation to data analysis.
On a final note, the traditional world slinging record was actually accomplished with a similar style with one rotation.
While not as interesting, the 180 degree spring-action rotation phone style has also gotten a following notably with Nokia….
Neither displacement nor rotation amplitude differences between style 1 and style 2 were dependent on manipulation technique (p=0.60 and p=0.74 for style×technique interactions).
To assess whether a distribution in change of scores was attributed to the independent variables (i.e. gender, profession, previous head-and-neck clinical rotation, and learning style), further analyses was performed.
