Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(4)
Exact(59)
A case study was considered for data analysis and observation.
The study was considered non-localizing if no cluster was found that could fit the IOZ.
Aggregation phenomena cannot be verified, since a single nanoparticle study was considered.
Crowding in this study was considered the tooth size-arch length discrepancy.
The study was considered exempt from review by the hospital IRB.
Therefore, stage 2 was not needed, the study was considered completed, and the statistical analysis was conducted with α = 0.05.
Because only anonymized, publicly-available data were used, the study was considered exempt from human subjects committee review.
However, a follow-up study was considered necessary to deal with a number of limitations of the former survey.
The Dutch study was considered to be of good methodological quality, although it had room for many improvements [30].
Because only anonymized, publicly-available data were used, the study was considered exempt from human subjects committee review at FDA.
The need for individual patient consent was waived by both committees, as the study was considered a quality assurance project.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com