Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(5)
To test if gene duplication is associated with increased transcript variation, I used a previous study that classified genes within the Arabidopsis genome as unique, segmental duplicate or tandem duplicate [5].
Not only it is necessary to find previous screens containing genes in common with the new set, but also useful to easily access the individual manuscript or study that classified those genes.
This age difference was also observed in a recent study that classified subjects on the presence or absence of aphasia and AOS (Rohrer et al., 2010).
Similarly, in a large American study that classified women as having MS if an ICD code for MS was present on hospital discharge abstracts, an elevated risk of Caesarean section associated with MS was found.
A study that classified patients into 75 79, 80 84 and ≥ 85 year age groups found that age was not associated with ICU mortality, but with long-term mortality (aOR: 2.17, for patients ≥ 85 years old and 1.82, for patients 80 84 years old) [ 6].
Similar(55)
Section 3 introduces the notion of scale structure and a previous study that classifies Chinese motion morphemes into four types based on the kind of scale that the morphemes lexicalize.
In addition, studies that classified participants as trained (greater than 2 h moderate intensity exercise per week or a mean age related VO2max greater than excellent as classified by the ACSM [3]) were excluded.
Many studies that classify patients as impaired or not, established on 'failing' a number of tests at a given criteria, are cross sectional and do not account for a change in cognitive function and other factors such as practice effects.
Every study that is classified as low risk for all domains will be considered to be at low risk of bias.
According to the classification by Rasmussen et al. [ 20], the patients in this study that were classified as neuropathic, could with most certainty be considered as definite since the etiology is spinal cord injury.
The quality review included 10 general items and overall evaluation item that classified each study as high quality, acceptable or low quality.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com