Sentence examples for study of violating from inspiring English sources

"To use irresponsible and reckless language, I think, accusing the Department of Justice prematurely, perhaps without full study, of violating the law and the Constitution, as some have, I think does have the tendency to erode unity in the country and undermine respect for our leadership in a time of war".

The statement also accuses Tang Guangwen of Tufts University in Boston, the corresponding author of the study, of violating Chinese regulations and importing the rice into China without proper approvals.

When the summary odds ratio is ≥1.15-fold from null association, a grade of C is assigned when a significant modified regression test suggests the possibility of bias or when the association is no longer nominally significant on exclusion of the initial study or of studies violating the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium.

We present a new powerful liquid hydrogen target developed for the precise study of parity violating electron scattering on hydrogen and deuterium.

While the Air Force has conducted limited studies for individual areas, the lawsuit accuses it of violating the National Environmental Policy Act by not studying the cumulative effects of training flights.

The present study showed that the couples´ perceptions of the PPAP increasing their safety overshadowed any risk of violating personal integrity.

We found no evidence of violating the proportional hazards assumption.

Results: We show how to conduct such studies without violating privacy of individual donors and without leaking the data to third parties.

For cardiac mortality occurring in nonpatient samples, Chida and Steptoe included six effect sizes (see their Table 1), but two came from the same study, violating basic assumptions of meta-analysis.

Due to the observational nature of this study, patients who violated the study description or who discontinued early from the study were included in the analyses.

This is prudent, given that the protocol adopted by Ashby et al. (1997) introduced the potential for systematic differences between the two studies, thus violating a precondition of hypothesis testing within the Neyman-Pearson framework, namely, that under the conditions tested all mean responses are equal.