Sentence examples for study of the discrepancy from inspiring English sources

Needs assessment and context analysis is a systematic study of the discrepancy between what is and what should be needed in a group and situation of interest.

Although these mean ages based on nuclear DNA data do fall within the 95% confidence intervals of our study, some of the discrepancy in mean age estimates between our study and previous work may be due to the relatively poor fossil record for Dorylinae compared to other ant groups.

The objective of this article is to perform a systematic study of these discrepancies and to assess the use of automatic methods to assist curators in maintaining high-quality curation and in bridging gaps between information curated in multiple sources.

As hypothesised above, it is possible that the highly specialised tertiary cardiology care setting of our study explains the discrepancy between our results and those of previous studies.

One of the unusual and unexpected findings of this study was the discrepancy observed between the naïve raters in coding variables that were conceivably thought to be obvious (e.g., game time, score, day/night game).

Given the short-term nature of the study and the discrepancy between the physiological findings and the measures of direct patients benefit, the present findings need to be confirmed by further study.

The results of this study showed that the discrepancy of the sulfate concentration profile increases as the radius of a cast-in-situ pile decrease.

One limitation of the present study is the discrepancy in age between the cases and controls.

The small number of patients, the major limitation of the present study, might explain the discrepancy between the results of our study and a previous report by Henderson et al. 16 That report investigated the effect of Axona on 40 genotyped patients (16 Apatientstients and 24 Apatientstients).

In recent years, there has been increasing interest in the study of discrete discrepancy.

Secondly, we multiplied this value by 1.25 to adjust for adherence, based on a study of the size of the discrepancy between statin prescribing for both primary and secondary prevention, and dispensing of those prescriptions [ 30].