However, five significant SNPs in HIVEP3 (min P=0.004) were observed, although the two significant HIVEP3 SNPs from the PD WGA study were not significant in our datasets.
If a result that is significant in a CNV genome-wide association study is not significant in GSA it might still be important if it perturbs a pathway.
For this age group, the difference with the seroprevalence determined in this study is not significant.
However, it is concerning that the largest multicenter study was not significant for any of these end-points.
Differences in the pattern of AEs throughout the study were not significant, due to the small number of reported AEs.
Similar results have been reported in two additional trials, whereas in another study a not significant trend was observed.
The change in hsCRP levels in our study was not significant by the end of the 6-month follow-up.
Age, sex, diabetes therapy at baseline, and starting insulin during the study were not significant in this model.
The difference between the serum UA levels in the two groups before the start of the study was not significant.
Heterogeneity of included studies was not significant for SAP studies (DF = 4, p = 0.25, I2 = 26.4%) or for SDD studies (DF = 9, p = 0.71, I2 = 0%).
