Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(36)
Baseline information from the 576 formal study evaluations was compared with the non-evaluated sample (n=455), the outcomes of which were to be ascribed from multiple imputation.
A total of 121 study evaluations were performed by 62 risk assessors in phase I (Klimisch evaluation method), and 104 study evaluations by 54 participants in phase II (CRED evaluation method).
In this study, evaluations were only performed up to 2 weeks after surgery, and thus the preventative effect of nepafenac on CME was not examined.
By requiring the reporting of evaluation results for each criterion, the CRED evaluation method provides documented transparency regarding the use of expert judgment in study evaluations.
The majority of the participants (58%% in phase I and 62 % in phase II) had more than 5 years of experience in performing ecotoxicity study evaluations.
Its application increases transparency of study evaluations, and can improve the harmonization of risk and hazard assessments, among frameworks as well as countries, institutes, and individual assessors.
Similar(24)
How about money management advice, a real estate feasibility study, evaluation of a merger or acquisition or documents translated into virtually any language in the world?
Prior to this study, evaluation of morphine with a GC method was carried out.
In this study, evaluation of antioxidant activity of the tea leaves was conducted.
Open image in new window Fig. 1 Flowchart of eligible study evaluation.
Study evaluation was complete in 2001.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com