Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(60)
Unfortunately, most of these studies were small, involving forty or fifty men.
The studies were small and preliminary, and none were randomized, double-blind trials.
Previously, acupuncture research suffered from the fact that clinical studies were small, often too small to allow meaningful conclusions.
The experimental studies were small – fewer than 100 participants in each grouping – but the effects were statistically significant and large.
Most previous studies were small and over a limited time interval.
But the studies were small and relatively short, lasting under two years.
All these studies were small, short-term and limited in scope.
But both studies were small and neither had control groups, so it's hard to know whether the perceived benefits can actually be credited to the stem-cell therapies.
The majority of reviewed studies were small, cross-sectional studies with poorly defined control groups and lacking validation.
Prior studies were small and did not consider potential differences in the association across body sizes and other related subgroups.
Pivotal studies were small clinical trials.
More suggestions(4)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com