Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(12)
For each principle, the studies were ranked as high, medium or low quality.
Included studies were ranked according to their levels of evidence.
Studies were ranked according to the NICE scale from ++ to + to – from lowest to highest risk of bias [ 24].
Studies were ranked, with a 'low-risk' study deemed to have the least risk of bias and considered to be a rigorous economic study (Additional file 4).
Selected studies were ranked and assigned levels of evidence in accordance with the 2011 Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (CEBM) Levels of Evidence [ 9].
Studies were ranked according to quality score and we investigated whether the ranking of each study was different according to the method used to weight the quality scores.
Similar(48)
The most positive aspect of the quality assessment is that none of the studies was ranked as "worthless".
The studies are ranked roughly in order of the quality of the exposure definition, with the highest quality exposure definitions towards the bottom of each plot.
Studies are ranked according to decreasing specificity (within subgroups).
Accordingly, in Table 1 the studies are ranked for sensitivity of the mutation detection method.
Each of the included studies was ranked according to the QUADAS description provided in Supplementary Table 1.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com