Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(11)
Federally funded studies were less likely to report results than those funded by drug companies.
In general, the study concludes that over time the field has become much less efficient; new studies were less likely to reveal new parts of the biochemical network.
Therefore, these landmark studies were less likely to be identified by the search "anesthesia".
Government funded studies were less likely to have conclusions favouring the vaccines (0.45, 0.26 to 0.90).
Both types of studies were less likely to indicate policy recommendations, while mixed methods studies were more likely to recommend only programme interventions.
This means that studies that did not find a protective association for beta-blockers and mortality in COPD patients (negative studies) were less likely to be published.
Similar(49)
Papers at the closed meeting are often more cutting edge and conceptual in nature, and thus these studies are less likely to have immediate clinical application.
This also means that real case-control differences from robust studies are less likely to be confounded by cryptic population stratification than similar SNP studies, although we would recommend that population stratification is controlled for as far as possible.
Negative studies are less likely to be published, potentially leading to an overestimation of effects.
Therefore, cross-sectional studies are less likely to reveal evidence for hippocampal abnormalities.
Some publication bias is likely, since negative studies are less likely to have been submitted or published.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com