Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(12)
Furthermore, all studies were evaluated with regard to the choice of activity evaluation tool and its measurement characteristics.
Sixteen case studies were evaluated with the SRC-DSS.
In total, 15 studies were evaluated with only studies of poor methodological quality for isometric mid-thigh pull [24, 29, 60, 72, 73] found within included studies, two studies were rated fair for the isometric squat test [69, 74] and one as poor for the isometric leg press [45].
Differences between treatment groups in animal studies were evaluated with the Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric test for multiple group comparisons, and the Mann-Whitney U test for two-group comparisons.
Studies were evaluated with the Χ2 test.
This time, 16 randomized studies were evaluated, with 884 patients in the study group.
Similar(48)
Key studies are evaluated with an emphasis on understanding the mechanisms through which carbon nanotubes interact with biological systems.
Quality of included studies was evaluated with Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool.
Heterogeneity across the studies was evaluated with Higgins' I 2 statistics at an alpha level of 0.05.
Heterogeneity across studies was evaluated with the I value and a χ-based Q test.
Heterogeneity between studies was evaluated with the I test and the Q statistic.
More suggestions(2)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com