Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(7)
Inconsistencies between studies were detected in all 14 predictors, and 12 predictors were consistently not predictive.
Only retrospective studies were detected.
However, just 10 intervention studies were detected.
Fifteen primary studies were detected from the reference lists of these 75 articles.
No trends towards significance with the SNPs in either ion channels or NOS1AP relevant to QT length in the previous studies were detected.
Eighty-four repofts of evidence level 4 (case series or poor quality cohort or poor quality case control studies) were detected.
Similar(53)
Furthermore, a similar share of holistic TBL orientation and economic-environmental studies is detected.
Significant heterogeneity of the studies was detected.
No significant heterogeneity between these studies was detected.
No heterogeneity across studies was detected in the analysis (I=0%).
Considerable heterogeneity across the studies was detected (I = 74 %).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com