Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(42)
The results across the remaining seven studies were comparable; the summary OR was 0.66 (95% CI=0.55 0.78) (P heterogeneity=0.32) comparing the highest to the lowest level of soy intake.
Despite such differences, SUVmean reproducibility results across studies were comparable: Reproducibility in our study was 14.9%% (primaries 8.9%%, nodes 18.0 %) compared to 10.5%% [ 28], 7.0 % [ 29] and 4.5 % [ 30] in previous reports exclusively or predominantly including primary lesions.
The exposure and control groups in the majority of studies were comparable, except for three studies [ 21, 34, 35] that did not compare them and seven studies [ 11, 17, 22, 36- 39] that did not report the non-response rate.
Patients of both studies were comparable regarding age.
The mean impact factors of prospective and retrospective studies were comparable (3.5 and 3, respectively) (Table 6).
Data from the flow cytometric studies were comparable to the IFN-γ ELISPOT (data not shown).
Similar(18)
Therefore, only a few studies are comparable.
Hence, the results obtained from all these studies are comparable.
Although implant survival rates given in different studies are comparable, analyzing mucositis and peri-implantitis prevalence is challenging.
This limits the degree to which these studies are comparable.
The results of the two studies are comparable.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com