Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(60)
Subgroups of studies were assessed to explore heterogeneity.
Using the NOQAS quality assessment, the seven studies were assessed to have moderate quality.
He believes there are problems with the way the studies were assessed.
At each step in the screening process studies were assessed based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Thirty-seven studies were assessed by the FDA as positive and, with one exception, every single one of those positive trials got properly written up and published.
The included studies were assessed by study design and statistical methodology.
Nineteen studies were assessed as being of "positive" and 4 of "neutral" quality.
Studies were assessed for quality, analysed descriptively and meta-analysed when possible.
Identified economic studies were assessed with the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) guidelines.
All studies were assessed for risk of bias and level of evidence.
Eight studies were assessed as moderate in quality; one study was given a weak rating.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com