Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(6)
The length and timing of these studies was largely dictated by current UK legislation, though an exemption and relevant permits could be obtained for longer term trials.
The antibody response measured by the ECL assay in ALL studies was largely reactive to calicheamicin moiety of the InO.
However, the predictive value of HbA1c in these studies was largely attributable to its association with other risk factors.
The reporting of the included studies was largely inadequate and this necessitated contacting the trial authors to try and obtain the required information.
First, as the operationalisation of HSU in included studies was largely constrained by the use of secondary data from service databases, future HSU studies may benefit from the administration of measures such as the Client Services Receipt Inventory, 24 alongside secondary data.
In addition, exposure in prior studies was largely measured in middle age or at time of diagnosis, was variable on how PCBs were classified and whether individual congeners were considered, and was based on samples obtained after PCB use was regulated [ 6– 8].
Similar(54)
The case studies are largely committed to individual stories that may serve as a basis for a larger study.
However, these studies are largely univariate analyses using retrospectively recorded data.
Previous studies are largely based on the equivalent single layer theories in which the natural frequencies are grossly overestimated.
Existing studies are largely descriptive rather than explanatory, and do not explain how and why changes occurred.
STEM studies are largely focused on educational curriculum and academic policy effects.
More suggestions(15)
studies was virtually
studies was generally
studies was mainly
studies was significantly
studies was widely
studies was heavily
studies was primarily
studies was greatly
students was largely
studies was considerably
education was largely
science was largely
trial was largely
literature was largely
found was largely
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com