Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(44)
In addition, the methodological quality of all the included studies was generally of moderate quality.
The quality of all studies was generally high, had low risk of bias, and satisfied the majority of the risk of bias criteria.
The heterogeneity among the studies was generally proportional to the correlation coefficients, with I2 values from 81% to 97% for the canine and second molar, respectively.
Among the studies included in this systematic review, the methodological quality of studies was generally modest (mean score = 18.69, out of a highest possible score of 27).
Methodological quality of studies was generally poor with only 11 studies rated as adequate using the Clinical Trial Assessment Measure (CTAM).
The heterogeneity between studies was generally low, in spite of the observational nature of the included studies and the additional uncertainty one might expect from the employed medication use prevalence adjustments.
Similar(16)
These sorts of studies are generally thought of as hypothesis-generating studies.
Therefore, these studies are generally not independent and lack general predictability.
Other clinical studies are generally based on conditions reported by rescue and recovery workers.
Contemporary personality studies are generally empirical and based on experiments.
But the studies are generally based on reports from the parents themselves, and some researchers question whether such data are all that meaningful.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com