Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(50)
The two studies used the same raw data but focused on different time periods and used different experts to tabulate the numbers.
Both studies used the same validated questions to diagnose migraine.
Both studies used the same diagnostic criteria for MOH as in the present study [2].
Both studies used the same instrument as the present study (see below).
Most studies used the same method of ascertainment for both FEM and HC participants, but this was not clearly specified in one study (Fleck et al. 2008).
Both studies used the same design and clinic protocol.
In a case where different studies used the same database, the more current study was used.
However, even though these studies used the same general paradigm, they investigated different aspects of the visuomotor transformations required by the task.
However, some of these studies used the same, or very similar approaches [17], [19] and/or similar data (different versions of the HapMap) [17], [18].
The six studies used the same format, namely, risk ratios (RRs), or hazard ratios (HRs) for the risk of developing dementia for diabetes compared with non-diabetes.
Both studies used the same protocol.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com