Exact(60)
There are numerous studies that performed the LCA on wind electricity generation systems.
In the setting of chronic HF, studies that performed guidance of therapy by NT-proBNP have had only limited success.
We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane library for studies that performed a 3D-planned corrective osteotomy on patients with a malunited distal radius fracture.
Previous studies that performed 30 repeated trials of each condition to enable statistical hypothesis testing of the results identified that 95% confidence intervals were negligible (usually narrower than the thickness of the line presented in the graph of results; see, for instance Figure two, [17]).
The results presented here show for the first time that fluctuation in MT is greater in MP compared to CS. Fluctuation in excitability over hours or days in MP is an issue that, until now, has been relatively neglected and is important to understanding contradictory findings of previous studies that performed single measures of excitability.
Moreover, for studies without regenotyping of a random sub-sample, a significant increase in CHD risk was found, but not for studies that performed regenotyping.
Only studies that validated their biomarker signature in an independent set of patient samples scored positively for this item; i.e., studies that performed internal validation using cross validation alone did not score positively.
Although all of the studies that performed statistical analyses conducted analyses that were appropriate for study data, there were several studies that performed little or no statistical analyses.
These findings were also reported in studies that performed 3 cultures on patients [ 23, 29- 31].
When this meta-analysis was restricted to studies that performed adjusted analyses, results did not materially change.
Three studies that performed a stretching intervention were included in the last meta-analysis [ 17, 18, 46].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com