Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(2)
Studies qualifying for data extraction were grouped into 2 categories: studies conducted before 2000 and studies after 2000.
The quality assessment was not used to exclude any studies qualifying for the review on the basis of their inclusion criteria.
Similar(57)
A total of five studies qualified for inclusion.
The protocols for isolation and propagation of MSCs were approved by the Univ. of Alabama Institutional Review Board, which determined that our studies qualified for the "No Human Subjects" designation and therefore did not require informed consent (approval # N060810001).
Fifty two studies qualified for the review.
Four studies qualified for trustworthy conclusions.
Three studies qualified for this category [ 22, 23, 27].
Eighteen studies qualified for the overall meta-analysis.
Of these, 11 studies qualified for the review analysis.
27 studies qualified for the inclusion in the meta-analysis.
We did not conduct statistical meta-analysis given that very few studies qualified for inclusion in the review.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com