Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(55)
Five studies met all requirements.
None of the published studies met all rules of genetic epidemiology.
Three of 11 studies met all but one of the quality criteria.
From more than 6,000 publications identified, 67 studies met all criteria for inclusion (Fig. 1).
From over 6,000 articles, 67 studies met all inclusion criteria.
Thirty-three studies met all criteria of which 8 studied human, 20 bovine, 2 equine, 1 ovine, 1 porcine and 1 canine cells using four different types of cultivated constructs.
Similar(5)
The overall methodological quality of included empirical studies was good, with more than half of studies meeting all criteria.
Studies meeting all inclusion criteria were independently screened by AC and ES for quality.
A search combining multiple fields can be performed easily for studies meeting all or any criteria.
Studies generally performed poorly when assessed on four components of trustworthiness, with only 17 studies meeting all four criteria (credibility; transferability; dependability and confirmability).
Two authors will then confirm which studies meet all inclusion criteria by independently reviewing the full text of potentially relevant articles.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com